I have been trying to understand the issue with the cartoons that have caused such a stir in the Middle East. At first I simply saw this as a free speech issue, and could not understand or accept the Muslim response. What bothered me most was the call from some Muslims to have their “justice” imposed upon westerners. And I was particularly bothered by certain governments in the Middle East calling for western governments to deal with this situation.
But what I think is most important about this whole issue is this: what was the intent of the cartoons? Now, before anyone starts into a rant about free speech not needing an intent, just bear with me.
Free speech, or freedom from physical retribution, is a very vague subject. In the west we want to be able to say any damn thing we want any place, at any time. And while I agree with this notion, I also believe that for society to work, there have to be self imposed barriers.
I for one want to live in a polite society, a civil society. We can’t create such a place if we allow our emotions to get out of control. Also, we cannot have the conversations we need to be having if everyone feels they can just go off and shout each other down. Which is pretty much how things are going right now.
There has to be a mutual respect between all people if we are ever going to break free of the viscious cycle of wars we have been trapped in for thousands of years. What is going on today is just one more example of what keeps people apart. Divided we fall.
The religious side does not respect the secular side, and vis versa. This is the cultural clash the founders of this country were trying to avoid in the Constitution. By seperating government and religion, they hoped to avoid the mistakes of the past. Give people freedom to worship, but leave governing to the mundane world.
This does not exist in the Middle East. Religion is government, or at least government cannot exist without a big nod from religion. And the Muslim faith is different from the Christian faith our founders were dealing with. So it is very difficult to blend the western secular ideals with the Middle East realities. A whole new way of thinking must be developed.
But all that aside, what we are faced with is an issue of respect for all ideas, and the challenge of finding a balance. Religion and government cannot be mixed. Sounds easy, but the reality of such a split is nearly impossible. Religious people hold their views very close to their hearts, and an insult against thier religion is seen as an insult against their person. In contrast, secular governing tries to give all people the freedom to believe what ever they want while at the same time ensuring that no one group imposes its beliefs on any others.
This is where respect comes in. If respect does not exist between groups, conversation cannot exist. Tensions rise because no one is talking to each other, and eventually everything falls apart.
To me, religion is something to be practiced in the home or church, while government is to be practiced in the community square. That is not to say relgious people should check their beliefs at the door, but they must remember that not everyone believes what they believe. And the same is true for the other side. Non-religious people must realize that religion is very imortant to some people, and the quickest way to stop a conversation is to start offending their religion.
That is where boundries come into play. And unfortunately I don’t think we as a society are muture enough to self regulate. Everyone wants to be right, everyone wants to have it their way. But with six billion people on the planet and growing, that is impossible. And as long as each group holds onto the notion that theirs is the right way and everyone else is wrong, friction will exist, and war is inevitable.
Take the cartoons. What was the intent of printing them? To prove a point? Intent is everything. And I believe the intent of these cartoons was to prove that there is a split in ideals, and that point has been proven. The problem is that now both sides are so caught up in screaming their side is right, there is no conversation going on.
I am not saying one side is better then the other. I think both sides are infact in the wrong here. The religious want others to obey, or at least respect, their laws. The west wants the Muslims to understand their laws. Which would all be fine if this whole debate was being held with the belief that there can be a compromise. Which it isn’t.
From what I have read the free speech advocates want to be able to say anything and everything and everyone should just deal with it. But aren’t the religious people just exercising their free speech right in preaching their beliefs? And the religious people want everyone to believe their religion is right, but they do not feel the need to respect any one else’s beliefs.
We all need to grow up. Just because you can say something doesn’t mean you should. And your beliefs are no better or worse then the beliefs of the person standing next to you. Just because you think you have the whole universe figured out in your head doesn’t mean it will make sense to anyone else. The ability to discuss ideas is both a gift and a curse. It means we can share our thoughts, but it also means others can share opposing views. And when we take the opposing view as a direct insult, all further conversation ends.
Add to this the need by some people to use speech strictly to insult and the inablilty for others to understand they let themselves be insulted, and you end up right where we are. The more I think about this issue, the more I see that free speech involves a level of maturity that the human race as a whole has not reached. It involves the ability to see others points of view while understanding that nothing is final. And as long as we all believe we are right and need to tell others how wrong they are, we will continue to fight.
And I don’t see this as a let’s all agree to disagree type of situation. There has to be some give and take on both sides. We all have to let go of our egos and look at the intent of our words. Am I saying something with the intent to argue, to offend, to discuss or draw attention?
The whole notion of free speech is a concept way ahead of its time. The human race is not quite ready for it. We all hold onto our perspective too tightly and cannot let others share their perspectives for fear it will unravel our grip on reality. If they are right, then we might be wrong, and then all our justifications for our actions are in danger of being exposed.
I think there is a need in humanity for concrete answers, something to grasp hold of, to soften the blow of the short lives we live and all of its mysteries. There are so many unanswered questions, so many uncontrollable events, that we build our walls around us and defend them to the death so we can feel secure. We need our ideals and beliefs to give us a foundation, or at least the sense of a foundation so we can deal with the day to day events of life. We need to develop a sense of purpose so we can try to control the confusion of our emotions in this ever changing world.
And it is these walls, this search for answers that leads us into conflict. If I spend my whole life building my wall and you walk up and show it to be based on a false premise, I might very well slip into chaos. My whole notion of self could be lost, my jusifications exposed and my own guilts forced to the surface. I will be exposed and naked, lost in the wilderness and alone.
Language gives us a gift to share and seek answers together. With the ability to share, we can connect with each other and even if we don’t ever find the answers we seek, at least we are not alone. But to do so we must accept each other as equals, we must listen to each other, and at the end of the day realize that what is in our head is not the same as what is in the heads of those around us. Mutual respect is nothing more then the acceptence of the individuality of each person.
It is the division of humanity that leads to conflict. It is the inability to believe that every person has a unique perspective that is part of the greater whole that keeps the cycle of war going. We must be aware of our intent every time we open our mouths and understand that justification is just a way to convince us we are right, because if we need to justify ourselves, something deep inside knows we are wrong.
I wish I had some inspiring words to share here, but that would just be my ego talking. I have never claimed to have any answers. I am just trying to stand back and view the whole of this stuation, to try and see as many sides as possible and understand how these conflicts arise.
Everything presented here is just my own little perspective. I believe humanity has great potential, and with that potential comes great responsiblity. We can destroy ourselves or grow beyond our present dreams. I think it is up to us. But as long as we continue to fight, as long as we keep ourselves divided, that potential will not be realized.
My own beliefs? I will wrap them up in a simple phrase: We are all alone, we are all we have, and we are all we need.